From the Edge Foundation's 2006 "What's your dangerous idea?"
by Kevin Kelly
More anonymity is good: that's a dangerous idea.
Fancy algorithms and cool technology make true anonymity in mediated environments more possible today than ever before. At the same time this techno-combo makes true anonymity in physical life much harder. For every step that masks us, we move two steps toward totally transparent unmasking. We have caller ID, but also caller ID Block, and then caller ID-only filters. Coming up: biometric monitoring and little place to hide. A world where everything about a person can be found and archived is a world with no privacy, and therefore many technologists are eager to maintain the option of easy anonymity as a refuge for the private.
However in every system that I have seen where anonymity becomes common, the system fails. The recent taint in the honor of Wikipedia stems from the extreme ease which anonymous declarations can be put into a very visible public record. Communities infected with anonymity will either collapse, or shift the anonymous to pseudo-anonymous, as in eBay, where you have a traceable identity behind an invented nickname. Or voting, where you can authenticate an identity without tagging it to a vote.
Anonymity is like a rare earth metal. These elements are a necessary ingredient in keeping a cell alive, but the amount needed is a mere hard-to-measure trace. In larger does these heavy metals are some of the most toxic substances known to a life. They kill. Anonymity is the same. As a trace element in vanishingly small doses, it's good for the system by enabling the occasional whistleblower, or persecuted fringe. But if anonymity is present in any significant quantity, it will poison the system.
There's a dangerous idea circulating that the option of anonymity should always be at hand, and that it is a noble antidote to technologies of control. This is like pumping up the levels of heavy metals in your body into to make it stronger.
Privacy can only be won by trust, and trust requires persistent identity, if only pseudo-anonymously. In the end, the more trust, the better. Like all toxins, anonymity should be keep as close to zero as possible
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Tofflers' Institutional Rate of Change Model
From Alvin and Heidi Tofflers' book Revolutionary Wealth
Today institutions are evolving/changing at vastly different rates:
100 mph - The company or business
90 mph - "Civil society" (NGO's, pro/anti-businee coalitions, prof groups, sports federations, Catholic orders, Buddhist nunneries, pliastics manufacturing associations, cults, tax haters, whale lovers, etc)
60 mph - The American family
30 mph - Labor unions
25 mph - government bureaucracies and regulatory agencies
5 mph - IGOs - UN, IMF, WTO, US Postal union
3 mph - US Political institutions - Congress, white house, political parties
1 mph - The law. Two parts: 1. the courts, bar associations, schools, firms and 2. the body of law these organizations interpret.
Today institutions are evolving/changing at vastly different rates:
100 mph - The company or business
90 mph - "Civil society" (NGO's, pro/anti-businee coalitions, prof groups, sports federations, Catholic orders, Buddhist nunneries, pliastics manufacturing associations, cults, tax haters, whale lovers, etc)
60 mph - The American family
30 mph - Labor unions
25 mph - government bureaucracies and regulatory agencies
5 mph - IGOs - UN, IMF, WTO, US Postal union
3 mph - US Political institutions - Congress, white house, political parties
1 mph - The law. Two parts: 1. the courts, bar associations, schools, firms and 2. the body of law these organizations interpret.
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Why Andrew Sullivan blogs
Andrew Sullivan's piece, Why I Blog, in the newly designed Atlantic Monthly that just arrived in our mailbox is timely. I've been told all my adult life that I need to write more, recently I've hoped that blogging might just be the medium that helps me develop the discipline. Sullivan provides a marvelously insightful analysis of what's involved (and at risk!) in getting engaged in, what he clearly portrays as, a way of life.
Blogging as he experiences it is not the same as writing for print publication with well thought out arguments. Instead blogging is full contact "conversation"; more akin to talk radio than printing press. Of course there's a spectrum of bloggers from neophytes like myself with less than 10 posts, to the pros (addicts?) who live online like Sullivan and Drudge.
21st century global society is learning about and changing with these new tools. We're coming to understand and expect that new tools don't necessarily displace, rather they compliment, find a place among and change the context for all other technologies, norms and structures. The mix gets ever denser and the speed of change disorients. Some believe we're losing our humanity, our ability to relate in the process of making new tools. Not Sullivan. He sees a grand, rich and immediate global dialog empowering our humanity as never before.
Our commander at US Southern Command started a blog this week - a nontraditional realm for a military Combatant Commander. We're not sure where it will lead, but we're confident we'll learn from the experiment. And I'm confident that, like Sullivan, we, the defense establishment, will be changed by the experience.
Blogging as he experiences it is not the same as writing for print publication with well thought out arguments. Instead blogging is full contact "conversation"; more akin to talk radio than printing press. Of course there's a spectrum of bloggers from neophytes like myself with less than 10 posts, to the pros (addicts?) who live online like Sullivan and Drudge.
21st century global society is learning about and changing with these new tools. We're coming to understand and expect that new tools don't necessarily displace, rather they compliment, find a place among and change the context for all other technologies, norms and structures. The mix gets ever denser and the speed of change disorients. Some believe we're losing our humanity, our ability to relate in the process of making new tools. Not Sullivan. He sees a grand, rich and immediate global dialog empowering our humanity as never before.
Our commander at US Southern Command started a blog this week - a nontraditional realm for a military Combatant Commander. We're not sure where it will lead, but we're confident we'll learn from the experiment. And I'm confident that, like Sullivan, we, the defense establishment, will be changed by the experience.
Friday, September 12, 2008
From Convergence to Collaboration
Peter Hirschberg's TedTalk provides a wonderously humorous look at the history of the computer and it's convergence with TV.
Hirschberg's tweener interviews are telling: TV is dying and the youngsters know it. This reminds me of Clay Shirky's talk wherein he tells of his friend's 6 year old daughter looking for the mouse behind the TV set.
Hirschberg's tweener interviews are telling: TV is dying and the youngsters know it. This reminds me of Clay Shirky's talk wherein he tells of his friend's 6 year old daughter looking for the mouse behind the TV set.
Thursday, September 11, 2008
American Forces Press Service article
I learned some lessons in the process of this article, especially pay attention when the reporter states that the interview is "on the record". No matter how much it is emphasized that they are "friendly" media and regardless of how genuinely nice the reporter is, they have to get a story worth telling.
In the end Donna proved extremely workable, but there were a few moments there when I was a little uneasy as to the future of my job...
SouthCom Transformation Promotes New Approach to Regional Challenges
By Donna Miles
American Forces Press Service
MIAMI, Aug. 26, 2008 - Along with U.S. Africa Command going fully operational Oct. 1, the Defense Department will reach another milestone as U.S. Southern Command completes a major reorganization that also promotes joint, interagency and even private- and public-sector cooperation.
The concept supports universal agreement among President Bush, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, Joint Chiefs Chairman Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, the service chiefs and the combatant commanders that the military can't tackle 21st-century security challenges alone.
The 2008 National Defense Strategy, released July 31, reflects in its first update since 2005 the importance of interagency as well as interservice and international cooperation to face today's and tomorrow's challenges.
"We are working to create an organization that can best adapt itself to working with the interagency, with our international partners and even with the private-public sector," said Navy Adm. James Stavridis, SouthCom commander. "And we want to do it in a way that is completely supportive of all our partners.
"If I would put one word on it, it's partnership," he continued. "That is our [SouthCom] motto -- Partnership for the Americas and our objective is to become the best possible international, interagency partner we can be."
Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, noted the similarities between what's happening at SouthCom and AfriCom during his late-June visit to the AfriCom headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany. Looking out at the audience during a town hall meeting, he called the new command's interagency makeup and the expansive capability it will bring a sign of things to come.
"I think you, in many ways, represent the face of the future with respect to our combatant commands," Mullen told the group. "You may be leading what we are doing in our government."
As they carry that charge, both SouthCom and AfriCom are breaking the mold for the way U.S. combatant commands have operated since passage of the National Security Act in 1947.
"The United States needs organizing structures that are custom-made for the age we live in, not where we have come from," said Army Lt. Col. Bryan Sparling, Stravridis' special assistant for long-range planning. "We in the federal government need to be organized so we can build and put together solutions to 21st-century security challenges, because they are not the same challenges we had in the 20th century."
Stavridis described the "enormous challenges" facing Central and South America during his mid-March testimony before the House Armed Services Committee. Without large-scale conventional wars looming on the horizon, the bigger regional challenges are poverty, drugs, the risk of regional terrorism and the beginnings of Islamic radical terrorism, he told the committee.
Like a long line of commanders before him, Stavridis recognized that traditional Cold War-era ways of operating didn't fit in SouthCom's area of focus, which includes all of Latin America and parts of the Caribbean. "Previous SouthCom commanders have recognized we need to fundamentally change how we do business around here," Sparling said.
Army Gen. Bantz J. Craddock, who preceded Stavridis as SouthCom commander, put together a tiger team in early 2006 to evaluate the command's organization, internal processes and strategy in light of its mission. "Our philosophy from the beginning was to say, 'This is about rethinking SouthCom and rethinking what a combatant command is,'" Sparling said.
Stavridis embraced many of the teams' conclusions and recommendations when he took command in October 2006, fine-tuning them with his staff before taking them to Gates for approval, Sparling said.
Gates gave the plan the green light, putting SouthCom's reorganization on his list of 25 transformation priorities for the Defense Department. SouthCom shares a single bullet on the list alongside AfriCom, with both commands to be structured as interagency operations by Oct. 1.
"So we are first cousins with AfriCom, no doubt about it," Sparling said. "The end state we and AfriCom are aiming for is really the same end state, philosophically."
Stavridis said he communicates regularly with Army Gen. William "Kip" Ward, the AfriCom commander, and Navy Vice Adm. Robert T. Moeller, Ward's deputy commander for military operations and a close personal friend, to share ideas about their ongoing efforts. "Our staffs are talking constantly, and we are indeed sharing lessons back and forth," he said.
He compared AfriCom's Africa Partnership Station initiative in the Gulf of Guinea, which provides maritime training to African volunteers, to a similar effort USNS Grasp is conducting in the Caribbean. "We are trying to do some very similar things, and it all goes back to partnership," he said.
Both commands have adopted a command structure with two deputies reporting to the commander ? one focused on military operations and one on civil-military activities. At AfriCom, Ambassador Mary Carlin Yates is the civilian deputy and Moeller is the military deputy. Their counterparts at SouthCom are Air Force Lt. Gen. Glenn F. Spears, military deputy to the commander, and Ambassador Paul A. Trivelli, civilian deputy to the commander and foreign policy advisor, who came on board earlier this week.
In addition, interagency staff members are spread throughout both commands, where they bring skills and expertise needed to elevate stability operations and prosperity-generating activities to the same level as security activities. The plan, Sparling said, is to increase interagency billets within the command by about 50 percent, to about 60.
While SouthCom and AfriCom are focused in the same direction, they're approaching their reorganization and standup, respectively, in ways tailored to their unique circumstances.
"We have the same end state, but our paths to get there are very different," Sparling said. "AfriCom was a top-down initiative that started with a presidential directive. Ours was a grassroots, bottom-up effort. It started down here, where we did some things internally, studied it, then ultimately, the commander took it forward."
As a result, "AfriCom has an initiation challenge, and we have a transformation challenge," Sparling said. "I won't say that one is easier or harder than the other. They are just different."
SouthCom approached its reorganization with a proven model of interagency cooperation in its Joint Interagency Task Force South in Key West, Fla. The task force, which has overseen air and maritime counterdrug missions in the Caribbean Sea, Gulf of Mexico and eastern Pacific for almost two decades, has become a model of interagency success.
In addition to the Defense Department, the Coast Guard, Drug Enforcement Agency, Customs and Border Protection, Central Intelligence Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, National Security Agency and National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency bring their unique capabilities to the task force.
The task force's success exemplified by last year's interdiction of more than 200 metric tons of cocaine ? didn't happen overnight and came through learning what worked and what didn't, Sparling said.
"You need to have all these folks working together and cooperating. You have to build a coalition of the willing," he explained. "And that's the way they work today. It is truly remarkable."
The task force has "without a doubt, been our model" for the SouthCom transformation, Sparling said.
To take that model commandwide, SouthCom started by breaking its mission down to three priorities: ensuring regional security, enhancing regional stability and enabling partnering.
"Our focus has broadened to maintaining security, building and increasing stability and setting the conditions for prosperity in the region," Sparling said.
The next step was to replace the old J-coded staff structure another constraint better suited to large troop movements than current operations in the region and realign SouthCom into what Sparling called a "strategy-focused organization."
The headquarters now operates with six directorates three mission directorates in line with the command's three long-term goals, and three functional directorates that support them.
The changeover to this new organizational structure began in February, with most of the internal shuffling of people finished by late May.
"We're in the refinement phase right now, and will call our provisional reorganization complete by the end of the fiscal year," Sparling said. "That's an important milestone."
While the reorganization provides a framework better suited to SouthCom's operations, Sparling said, a true transformation ultimately boils down to the people involved. "Yes, we believe the new structures will better enable us to work together in new ways to address the security challenges we have," he said.
But another benefit, he said, is that the reorganization forces people to rethink their individual roles in the overall organization.
The people at SouthCom have become key to the command's transformation, Sparling said. He described the close interagency cooperation they are demonstrating, along with increased engagement with nongovernmental organizations, private-sector groups and others who share the same goals, as the "mass of the iceberg below the waterline" that will ensure the command's long-term effectiveness.
Stavridis said he'll leave it to others to determine if what works in SouthCom will work in other geographic commands.
"My job is to try to build an organization that is appropriate for the world to the south," he said. "I think we have done that, and I think we will continue to work very hard doing that, and I'll let others draw appropriate lessons."
Meanwhile, he said, he's impressed with the broad support the command has received from interagency partners, Congress and others who are watching and participating in the transformation. "It's going very well," he said. "We are working very hard to make sure we answer everyone's questions and do everything within the boundaries of policy and law, and do it with full transparency."
"The bottom line is that what we are doing here makes sense," Sparling said. "We want to be a shaper of ideas, helping build partnerships between actors that don't traditionally work together, all focused on a common purpose.
"Ultimately," he said, "that's what will give us the ability to develop security solutions that will be effective in our new contemporary operating environment."
Biographies:
Navy Adm. James Stavridis <http://www.defenselink.mil/bios/biographydetail.aspx?biographyid=107>
Related Sites:
U.S. Southern Command <http://www.southcom.mil/appssc/index.php>
U.S. Africa Command <http://www.africom.mil/>
In the end Donna proved extremely workable, but there were a few moments there when I was a little uneasy as to the future of my job...
SouthCom Transformation Promotes New Approach to Regional Challenges
By Donna Miles
American Forces Press Service
MIAMI, Aug. 26, 2008 - Along with U.S. Africa Command going fully operational Oct. 1, the Defense Department will reach another milestone as U.S. Southern Command completes a major reorganization that also promotes joint, interagency and even private- and public-sector cooperation.
The concept supports universal agreement among President Bush, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, Joint Chiefs Chairman Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, the service chiefs and the combatant commanders that the military can't tackle 21st-century security challenges alone.
The 2008 National Defense Strategy, released July 31, reflects in its first update since 2005 the importance of interagency as well as interservice and international cooperation to face today's and tomorrow's challenges.
"We are working to create an organization that can best adapt itself to working with the interagency, with our international partners and even with the private-public sector," said Navy Adm. James Stavridis, SouthCom commander. "And we want to do it in a way that is completely supportive of all our partners.
"If I would put one word on it, it's partnership," he continued. "That is our [SouthCom] motto -- Partnership for the Americas and our objective is to become the best possible international, interagency partner we can be."
Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, noted the similarities between what's happening at SouthCom and AfriCom during his late-June visit to the AfriCom headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany. Looking out at the audience during a town hall meeting, he called the new command's interagency makeup and the expansive capability it will bring a sign of things to come.
"I think you, in many ways, represent the face of the future with respect to our combatant commands," Mullen told the group. "You may be leading what we are doing in our government."
As they carry that charge, both SouthCom and AfriCom are breaking the mold for the way U.S. combatant commands have operated since passage of the National Security Act in 1947.
"The United States needs organizing structures that are custom-made for the age we live in, not where we have come from," said Army Lt. Col. Bryan Sparling, Stravridis' special assistant for long-range planning. "We in the federal government need to be organized so we can build and put together solutions to 21st-century security challenges, because they are not the same challenges we had in the 20th century."
Stavridis described the "enormous challenges" facing Central and South America during his mid-March testimony before the House Armed Services Committee. Without large-scale conventional wars looming on the horizon, the bigger regional challenges are poverty, drugs, the risk of regional terrorism and the beginnings of Islamic radical terrorism, he told the committee.
Like a long line of commanders before him, Stavridis recognized that traditional Cold War-era ways of operating didn't fit in SouthCom's area of focus, which includes all of Latin America and parts of the Caribbean. "Previous SouthCom commanders have recognized we need to fundamentally change how we do business around here," Sparling said.
Army Gen. Bantz J. Craddock, who preceded Stavridis as SouthCom commander, put together a tiger team in early 2006 to evaluate the command's organization, internal processes and strategy in light of its mission. "Our philosophy from the beginning was to say, 'This is about rethinking SouthCom and rethinking what a combatant command is,'" Sparling said.
Stavridis embraced many of the teams' conclusions and recommendations when he took command in October 2006, fine-tuning them with his staff before taking them to Gates for approval, Sparling said.
Gates gave the plan the green light, putting SouthCom's reorganization on his list of 25 transformation priorities for the Defense Department. SouthCom shares a single bullet on the list alongside AfriCom, with both commands to be structured as interagency operations by Oct. 1.
"So we are first cousins with AfriCom, no doubt about it," Sparling said. "The end state we and AfriCom are aiming for is really the same end state, philosophically."
Stavridis said he communicates regularly with Army Gen. William "Kip" Ward, the AfriCom commander, and Navy Vice Adm. Robert T. Moeller, Ward's deputy commander for military operations and a close personal friend, to share ideas about their ongoing efforts. "Our staffs are talking constantly, and we are indeed sharing lessons back and forth," he said.
He compared AfriCom's Africa Partnership Station initiative in the Gulf of Guinea, which provides maritime training to African volunteers, to a similar effort USNS Grasp is conducting in the Caribbean. "We are trying to do some very similar things, and it all goes back to partnership," he said.
Both commands have adopted a command structure with two deputies reporting to the commander ? one focused on military operations and one on civil-military activities. At AfriCom, Ambassador Mary Carlin Yates is the civilian deputy and Moeller is the military deputy. Their counterparts at SouthCom are Air Force Lt. Gen. Glenn F. Spears, military deputy to the commander, and Ambassador Paul A. Trivelli, civilian deputy to the commander and foreign policy advisor, who came on board earlier this week.
In addition, interagency staff members are spread throughout both commands, where they bring skills and expertise needed to elevate stability operations and prosperity-generating activities to the same level as security activities. The plan, Sparling said, is to increase interagency billets within the command by about 50 percent, to about 60.
While SouthCom and AfriCom are focused in the same direction, they're approaching their reorganization and standup, respectively, in ways tailored to their unique circumstances.
"We have the same end state, but our paths to get there are very different," Sparling said. "AfriCom was a top-down initiative that started with a presidential directive. Ours was a grassroots, bottom-up effort. It started down here, where we did some things internally, studied it, then ultimately, the commander took it forward."
As a result, "AfriCom has an initiation challenge, and we have a transformation challenge," Sparling said. "I won't say that one is easier or harder than the other. They are just different."
SouthCom approached its reorganization with a proven model of interagency cooperation in its Joint Interagency Task Force South in Key West, Fla. The task force, which has overseen air and maritime counterdrug missions in the Caribbean Sea, Gulf of Mexico and eastern Pacific for almost two decades, has become a model of interagency success.
In addition to the Defense Department, the Coast Guard, Drug Enforcement Agency, Customs and Border Protection, Central Intelligence Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, National Security Agency and National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency bring their unique capabilities to the task force.
The task force's success exemplified by last year's interdiction of more than 200 metric tons of cocaine ? didn't happen overnight and came through learning what worked and what didn't, Sparling said.
"You need to have all these folks working together and cooperating. You have to build a coalition of the willing," he explained. "And that's the way they work today. It is truly remarkable."
The task force has "without a doubt, been our model" for the SouthCom transformation, Sparling said.
To take that model commandwide, SouthCom started by breaking its mission down to three priorities: ensuring regional security, enhancing regional stability and enabling partnering.
"Our focus has broadened to maintaining security, building and increasing stability and setting the conditions for prosperity in the region," Sparling said.
The next step was to replace the old J-coded staff structure another constraint better suited to large troop movements than current operations in the region and realign SouthCom into what Sparling called a "strategy-focused organization."
The headquarters now operates with six directorates three mission directorates in line with the command's three long-term goals, and three functional directorates that support them.
The changeover to this new organizational structure began in February, with most of the internal shuffling of people finished by late May.
"We're in the refinement phase right now, and will call our provisional reorganization complete by the end of the fiscal year," Sparling said. "That's an important milestone."
While the reorganization provides a framework better suited to SouthCom's operations, Sparling said, a true transformation ultimately boils down to the people involved. "Yes, we believe the new structures will better enable us to work together in new ways to address the security challenges we have," he said.
But another benefit, he said, is that the reorganization forces people to rethink their individual roles in the overall organization.
The people at SouthCom have become key to the command's transformation, Sparling said. He described the close interagency cooperation they are demonstrating, along with increased engagement with nongovernmental organizations, private-sector groups and others who share the same goals, as the "mass of the iceberg below the waterline" that will ensure the command's long-term effectiveness.
Stavridis said he'll leave it to others to determine if what works in SouthCom will work in other geographic commands.
"My job is to try to build an organization that is appropriate for the world to the south," he said. "I think we have done that, and I think we will continue to work very hard doing that, and I'll let others draw appropriate lessons."
Meanwhile, he said, he's impressed with the broad support the command has received from interagency partners, Congress and others who are watching and participating in the transformation. "It's going very well," he said. "We are working very hard to make sure we answer everyone's questions and do everything within the boundaries of policy and law, and do it with full transparency."
"The bottom line is that what we are doing here makes sense," Sparling said. "We want to be a shaper of ideas, helping build partnerships between actors that don't traditionally work together, all focused on a common purpose.
"Ultimately," he said, "that's what will give us the ability to develop security solutions that will be effective in our new contemporary operating environment."
Biographies:
Navy Adm. James Stavridis <http://www.defenselink.mil/bios/biographydetail.aspx?biographyid=107>
Related Sites:
U.S. Southern Command <http://www.southcom.mil/appssc/index.php>
U.S. Africa Command <http://www.africom.mil/>
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
Senior Military insights
Fascinating column yesterday by Bob Woodward: Outmaneuvered And Outranked, Military Chiefs Became Outsiders. He writes with such a fantastic style - gripping and fun, he makes you believe he was in the room - but its also pretty difficult to take seriously. I want to believe it but I have a hard time with the sensationalist vibe. I also have a tough time calling this either history (its much to close to have perspective) or journalism (way too much of his opinion is written between the lines).
While its frustrating to see our system breakdown - the have the commander in chief largely bypass his official advisers (the Joint Chiefs), it is somehow refreshing to see a president doing what he has to to find a politically tenable, if risky, military solution. We've got to win the war we're in.
I was interested to read recently that Gen Petreaus stopped voting when he got his second star.
While its frustrating to see our system breakdown - the have the commander in chief largely bypass his official advisers (the Joint Chiefs), it is somehow refreshing to see a president doing what he has to to find a politically tenable, if risky, military solution. We've got to win the war we're in.
I was interested to read recently that Gen Petreaus stopped voting when he got his second star.
Social Entrepreneurship
Pondering my potential retirement from the military and trying to discern what God would have me do with two decades of relatively diverse experience, I've recently become fascinated with the idea of "social entrepreneurship." This term, which, I've come to find out, has been around at least since the '80s, encompasses quite well what I thought I was dreaming up on my own as a novel idea! Well all the better that this wonderful concept didn't wait around for me.
Some key organizations: The Skoll Foundation and Ashoka.
Most of these endeavors involves unique cooperative endeavors between public and private actors. Rick Warren points out that "public-private cooperation" was a huge topic at the Davos summit a few years back (no wonder its all over now).
But he takes it a step further pointing out that a stool with only two legs will tip over. What is really needed is Public-Private-Church cooperation. The Church is the ultimate logistics organization, on the ground in ever village in the world with a deep understanding of local culture, need and capability. His interview with Krista Tippett describes his awakening to the plight (existence) of the globe's underprivileged.
A recent cover story in Time describes the opening steps his "PEACE plan, a bid to turn every single Christian church on earth into a provider of local health care, literacy and economic development, leadership training and spiritual growth."
Some key organizations: The Skoll Foundation and Ashoka.
Most of these endeavors involves unique cooperative endeavors between public and private actors. Rick Warren points out that "public-private cooperation" was a huge topic at the Davos summit a few years back (no wonder its all over now).
But he takes it a step further pointing out that a stool with only two legs will tip over. What is really needed is Public-Private-Church cooperation. The Church is the ultimate logistics organization, on the ground in ever village in the world with a deep understanding of local culture, need and capability. His interview with Krista Tippett describes his awakening to the plight (existence) of the globe's underprivileged.
A recent cover story in Time describes the opening steps his "PEACE plan, a bid to turn every single Christian church on earth into a provider of local health care, literacy and economic development, leadership training and spiritual growth."
Cognitive tension
I got the title of this blog from a recent quote a I heard on a podcast on iTunes U from the Stanford Center for Social Innovation.
John Sage, founder of Pura Vida coffee, gave a talk entitled "How do you take your coffee?" wherein he describes his philosophy behind creating a company that is motivated by both profit and philanthropy.
Martin Luther King based a sermon entitled "The strength to love" on Math 10:16 where Jesus sends out his disciples "without a tunic" and instructs them to "Be as shrewd as serpents, and as gentle as doves." Highlighting the inherent contraction in such a statement King said,
Isn't that the truth! As much as we strive to understand and differentiate the contradictions of life, we can't. Instead understanding comes through holding seeming opposites in creative tension.
John Sage, founder of Pura Vida coffee, gave a talk entitled "How do you take your coffee?" wherein he describes his philosophy behind creating a company that is motivated by both profit and philanthropy.
Martin Luther King based a sermon entitled "The strength to love" on Math 10:16 where Jesus sends out his disciples "without a tunic" and instructs them to "Be as shrewd as serpents, and as gentle as doves." Highlighting the inherent contraction in such a statement King said,
The strong man holds in a living blend strongly marked opposites. The idealists are usually not realistic, and the realists are not usually idealistic. Seldom are the humble self-assertive, or the self-assertive humble. But life at its best is a creative synthesis of opposites living together in fruitful harmony.
Isn't that the truth! As much as we strive to understand and differentiate the contradictions of life, we can't. Instead understanding comes through holding seeming opposites in creative tension.
Bryan begins a blog
Seminal event. Hopefully. My first blog post ever. 9/9/08 - I guess I should wait a year for numerical elegance, but the time just feels right. I'm hoping blogging will solve a number of problems for me.
A dynamic, ubiquitously available journal for my thoughts and reflections on readings and whatnot. for years I've wanted a solution to the ever growing box(es) of paper (articles, papers. etc) following me around the world. And I save only the best ones! ones that I've marked up and thought I might find useful again someday. so right out of the gate I lose a great deal of content, and then the I "lose" the stuff that I do keep in the box(es).
This blog is for me. I need a searchable system. One that I can mark with keywords and comments. It needs to be near real-time, available where I am - either to post or to query. sounds like a web-log!
Scanning is cumbersome, but given that the vast majority of what I read now originates on the web, that will be an ever decreasing issue.
In my ideal world I'd go back and scan all the stuff I've ever read - thats likely rediculously difficult though. Better to "just go forward". And if life takes me back to any of those readings, I'll scan/link/reflect from there.
The writing aspects of this excite me as well. Everyone I know is constantly on me about writing. Hopefully I can create a habit of writing informally and in doing so potentially create some passages beneficial to others. The key is to just start writing and to make it a habit.
I'm quite optimistic at this moment. Really hopeful that I can make this a life-discipline.
So, here's to life on the web - may it be abundant!
A dynamic, ubiquitously available journal for my thoughts and reflections on readings and whatnot. for years I've wanted a solution to the ever growing box(es) of paper (articles, papers. etc) following me around the world. And I save only the best ones! ones that I've marked up and thought I might find useful again someday. so right out of the gate I lose a great deal of content, and then the I "lose" the stuff that I do keep in the box(es).
This blog is for me. I need a searchable system. One that I can mark with keywords and comments. It needs to be near real-time, available where I am - either to post or to query. sounds like a web-log!
Scanning is cumbersome, but given that the vast majority of what I read now originates on the web, that will be an ever decreasing issue.
In my ideal world I'd go back and scan all the stuff I've ever read - thats likely rediculously difficult though. Better to "just go forward". And if life takes me back to any of those readings, I'll scan/link/reflect from there.
The writing aspects of this excite me as well. Everyone I know is constantly on me about writing. Hopefully I can create a habit of writing informally and in doing so potentially create some passages beneficial to others. The key is to just start writing and to make it a habit.
I'm quite optimistic at this moment. Really hopeful that I can make this a life-discipline.
So, here's to life on the web - may it be abundant!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
